To: FULL SITE CONTENTS (click here).

The Site is About The Passed-in-2010 Obama Health Insurance Reform, and the Republican Efforts to Repeal the Reform.

The site includes tables for ASSESSING YOUR OWN (BY-STATE) RISK OF MEDICAL FINANCIAL WIPEOUT / ILLNESS NON=TREATMENT
Due to Pre-Existing-Conditions Issues




INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE IN CONNECTICUT


CONNECTICUT RESIDENTS HAVE UNIQUELY WEAK PROTECTION AMONG RESIDENTS OF STATES IN THE AREA

-- RELATED TO HANDLING OF PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS--


(This page posted by Norm Spier)




RESIDENTS OF ALL STATES:

Check RISK IN YOUR STATE and Compare the 50 States:


At
PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS BY STATE

(WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION PAID TO INSURANCE SYSTEM FLAWS THAT CAN FINANCIALLY WIPE OUT HIGH SAVERS)
, here at:

By-State Table

Directly to State In That Table: AL AR AK AZ CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA MA ME MD MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY Non-US






INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE IN CONNECTICUT


CONNECTICUT RESIDENTS HAVE UNIQUELY WEAK PROTECTION AMONG RESIDENTS OF STATES IN THE AREA

-- RELATED TO HANDLING OF PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS--

NOTE: 2/2011: THE STUFF BELOW WAS WRITTEN A FEW YEARS BACK. SINCE THEN, IN CERTAIN OF THE 5 COMMUNITY/ MODIFIED-COMMUNITY-RATED STATES WITHOUT A MANDATE TO MAINTAIN COVERAGE, INCREASING MEDICAL COSTS SEEM TO HAVE CAUSED A "DEATH SPIRAL" TO START IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THOSE STATES, FROM PEOPLE PICKING UP INSURANCE JUST WHEN THEY GET SICK, AND POSSIBLY ALSO FROM INTO-STATE MIGRATION OF SICK PEOPLE. (THE INSURANCE GETS TOO EXPENSIVE.--A few economists did actually predict this death spiral before it happened--the recent financial crisis apparently made many less-sick people drop their health insurance and the problem became much more serious in many places, aggravated of course by generally rising medical costs.)

A MASSACHUSETTS-LIKE PLAN, WITH A MANDATE, AND ESSENTIALLY THE SAME AS THE PASSED OBAMA PLANS WHICH GO INTO EFFECT IN 2014 IF NOT REPEALED/BLOCKED-IN-COURTS BY REPUBLICANS, IS APPARENTLY THE ONLY WAY FOR THE SYSTEM TO WORK, AND TO LET PEOPLE HAVE TRANSPORTABLE INSURANCE WITHOUT A LIFETIME-GUARANTEED PERMANENT JOB WITH GUARANTEED HEALTH INSURANCE. [Yes, indeed, cost controls are inadequate in the Obama plan. They will have to be added later, during a crisis, maybe like Greece of something. Devilishly irresponsible Republicans, by shouting "rationing", "death panels", and "socialism" for no other reason than to make Mr. Obama fail, have put much of the innumerate sector of the public out of the frame of mind for sensible and needed cost controls on the whole system, including Medicare.]

[My own personal history is that seeing the danger in CT in 2007 of costs for certain ages bounded by $25,000 per person a year, at that time rising rapidly, I moved to a (low-living-cost far-from-NYC) part of New York State, where individual insurance costs were about $10,000 a year per person per year. The financial crisis kicked in, making the "death spiral" mechanism really start to kick in, with costs in my part of the state hitting $15,000 a year per person, and in some poor remote counties, $18,000 a year. Further, as all but the sickest people might keep dropping policies, I could see no reason why we might not hit say $40,000 a year per person in a few years in New York. So I left that state as well.

Incidentally, in my own case, I could just rely on a job for health insurance, but I don't like the idea of me, or anyone, being cowed by an insurance system and employers into the meekness and potential exploitation that such system fosters (and may even be designed to foster). Thus, I'm moving around some based on assured transportability of health insurance, which facilitates a true and very real personal freedom worth holding on to.]



NON-EMPLOYER HEALTH INSURANCE OFFERS FULL LONG-TERM PROTECTION in: NY, NJ, MASS, VT


NON-EMPLOYER HEALTH INSURANCE GETS EXPENSIVE IN THE LONG-TERM IF YOU GET SICK IN CT






THE DIFFERENCE IS DUE TO LACK OF ANY FORM OF COMMUNITY RATING IN CONNECTICUT



--THE NOTABLY WEAK CT SYSTEM SEEMS TO BE TIED TO THE STRENGTH OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY IN CT. THEY PUT FORTH THE (MORE PROFITABLE) CONNECTICUT SETUP AS A "MODEL SYSTEM" FOR 33 OTHER STATES


CT RESIDENTS MIGHT NOT AGREE THAT IT IS A MODEL SYSTEM. LOOK AT THE MONTHLY RATES FOR PEOPLE WITH PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS IF YOU HAPPEN TO BE 61. Note that the stop-loss is $7500. per person. A couple with pre-existing conditions in their early 60s should plan on paying out about $44,000 each year in premiums plus copay Further, the engineering of the rules for the high-risk pool leaves some real financial wipeoput dangers.




COMMUNITY RATING: WHAT IS IT?


In most U.S. states, including CT, if you apply for a health insurance policy on your own (not through an employer), the insurance company makes you fill out a form about your medical history. If they determine you have now or previously have had any illness or health condition that is likely to cost them money in the future (like a heart condition or prior cancer), they either will not give you insurance, or charge you a very high rate, or else exclude anything related to that expensive condition. This is what is the case in CT, and is WHAT HAPPENS IN THE ABSENCE OF community rating. In the absence of community rating, if you happen to get sick at the wrong time: say before you lose or leave your job or retire early, or before your insurance company stops selling policies in your state, or you move from another state, it makes life very expensive for you, and you may even go broke.


This is not the case in states that have what is called Community Rating Laws. In the early 1990s, a number of states, including NY, NJ, MA, and VT passed reforms requiring Community Rating or Modified Community Rating. What this means, in the case of "Community Rating" is that, provided you have had health insurance from any source during a specified prior period (typically the 1 year prior to applying for new insurance), when you apply for any new insurance, the insurance company has to give you insurance, cannot exclude pre-existing conditions, and has to charge you exactly the same as what they charge any other person living in the same area of the state, regardless of your health. In the case of "Modified Community Rating", it is the same deal, except the rate charged is allowed to be higher for older people, but still not based on health. (Some may prefer "Modified Community Rating", as it gives younger people a reasonable break, and they often have accumulated less money, anyway.)



If you think about it, the reason for the requirement in Community Rated states of having insurance for a year prior to applying new insurance (without which the insurance company is allowed to charge you whatever they want or exclude pre-existing conditions), is so that people don't abuse the system and just get insurance once they get sick. WIth that requirement, people trying to freeload by buying insurance only when they got sick would have an excluded pre-existing condition or much higher insurance rates, and could lose huge amounts of money.

But, under community rating, or modified community rating, as in CTs neighboring states of NY, NJ, MA, and VT, for people who do not try to abuse the system, you get a pretty reasonable insurance rate, which can't get higher if you get sick, and can't leave you with humongous medical bills when you are uncovered, as long as you pay the standard rate that everyone pays, and maintain that coverage continuously.



THE RATES EVERYONE PAYS IN COMMUNITY RATED STATES THAT NEIGHBOR CT:

STATE

CHECK RATES HERE
HEALTH INSURANCE RULES AND GENERAL INFO HERE

NY

NY Rates
NY Rules

NJ

NJ Rates
NJ Rules

MA

MA Rates (Connector Programs under new Mass Reform):

Here are some test zip codes:
01201: Pittsfield, MA
01104: Springfield, MA
02114: Boston, MA
(Modified Community Rating Still Maintained under 2007 reform)

VT

VT Rates
VT Rules




WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR RATES AND COVERAGE IN CONNECTICUT IF YOU HAVE A MEDICAL CONDITION?

Of course, if you lose your insurance at your job, or retire early, or move into the state, or your current insurance company decides to stop selling insurance in the state, and you have a substantial medical condition, you won't get insurance from a private insurance company, unless it excludes your expensive condition, or they charge you a huge premium. So you're stuck regarding an individual policy.

There's another way you might get stuck, which you might not expect. Say you do develop a medical condition: a heart problem, cancer, etc., and at the time you currently have private insurance. You might feel secure: you have a policy, you keep paying the premium, and it is true that your company can not cancel your policy unless they decide to cancel all policies in the state. But that sense of security is false. What will happen is this: all of the people who are in your insurance policy's "pool" of people were pretty healthy when they got issued their policy. But over time, a few have gotten sick, but most are still pretty healthy. The small number of sick people in the pool will start to make rates rise a bit. Then other insurance companies, and possibly your own insurance company, will seek out the people in the pool who are still healthy, and sell them insurance that is a bit cheaper, since there are no sick people in that new pool. As they keep doing this, only pretty sick people will be left in your pool, and your insurance rates will get very high. You won't be able to get new insurance from a private company, though, unless they exclude your expensive condition. So, just like people who had an explicit loss of an old insurer, you're stuck, and you really need reasonably priced insurance or you may go broke. (This continuous increase in price due to other insurance companies cherry-picking out healthy people from the pool actually happened to me about 5 or 10 years ago here in CT. I had a policy that started at about $1000 a year, and in less than 5 years it went to about $5000 a year, which was more than the cost of the high risk pool for my young age at the time. When I called the insurance company that had issued the policy to ask how high the rate might go, they told me they couldn't say, but then they connected me immediately to their Connecticut agent, who tried to sell me a new pre-existing-screened policy. (That is, they tried to cherry-pick me from their own pool.) At that point, I just took the high-risk pool even though I was healthy, in order to avoid any part in the insane system, and also resolved to leave CT for a community-rated state at the nearest economically opportune time.) (Aside: that insurance company probably had cherry picked other people out of its own pool prior, and that was probably, in part, responsible for my rate rising so high. Whether that is illegal or not -- I haven't checked -- is irrelevant. If they hadn't cherry picked healthy people out, other insurance companies would have. The pre-existing-screened system is fundamentally unsound without some form of community rating. Moreover, folks of an economics or mathematical bent will easily see that this product being billed as "insurance", which is supposed to pool risk, actually pools only the risk of costs for a period of time after disease onset, that period of time getting shorter and shorter as the technology for cherry-picking gets better and better. Only restraint on the part of cherry pickers, motivated not by any morality, but rather by not making too obvious the uselessness of the consequent product, prevents them from using computer and internet technology to bring that period of time of being insured down to say 1 hour from disease onset.)

The last resort high-risk pool is the entity designed by CT law to give some protection if you get stuck without insurance as you easily can in CT, as above. A number of states that are not community rated have such an entity, (subsidized by the government or other policies) and how much good they do depends on the state. A problem is that it's pretty expensive. These are last years rates for a high deductible ($2500 ded/$7500 per person max copay) plan, and here they are for an HMO with $5000 per person max copay. For a person in their early 60s without a that looks like about $23,000 per year per sick person in CT. For that age group, this is double or much more what your total medical payout would be in our neighboring states of NY, NJ, MA, and VT! Financially, CT is a very risky place to be. (Insurance may be lower if you're not sick now, since insurance companies don't have to sell to sick people. But, if you get sick, in a while your rates will be much higher). So the somewhat cheaper insurance you may have isn't very good insurance.

For some additional reference or information on this issue, here is Health Insurance site for Connecticut State. (This is a separate site than the HRA, which is an independent state-regulated). The information on the site is not terribly informative, and they give you no hint that your financial situation is much more dangerous in the state. You may find still find some helpful information on the site, and you can call them and see what options you may have. Note that there is something of a patchwork of low-income and for-employer plans that may conceivably help you in particular situations. You might find out about these if you call.



Say a CT Insurance Company Covers Me and Takes my Premiums:

Do I have to Worry About the Not Paying Medical Bills Because They Accuse Me of Not Reporting a Pre-Existing Condition??

See CBS Evening News with Katie Couric story .
Note all the reader discussion, after the story, generally highlighting the financial risk and ruin.



Technical note (individual/group covered by different state rules): Note that Connecticut, like many other states that do not have community rating for individual policies, has had, as of 1993, modified community rating for small group policies, i.e. policies covering the employees of businesses. This is the result of CT businesses screaming to the legislature, at that time, that the non-community-rated "cherry-picking" system was ridiculous, and they were having to fire sick workers, etc., just to survive, because they couldn't afford the really high premiums of sick workers. So the CT legislature changed the system to the reasonable one for businesses. (And I've recently observed the president of the Connecticut Business and Industry Association still asserting that the pre-1993 pre-existing-condition-screened system for business was ridiculous and destroying businesses, and still lauding (in 2007) the current modified-community-rating system for BUSINESS.) But, observe, INDIVIDUALS, being much weaker than businesses in CT, and perhaps having no substantial lobby that is smart enough to not be fooled by the nonsense from the powerful state insurance industry, still, 14 years later, have the faulty and financially dangerous pre-existing-condition screened system! And all CT residents under 65, if they find they can no longer rely on their business-based group insurance for whatever reason, are then at the mercy of the CT INDIVIDUAL insurance rules!



BEWARE THE FALSE ARGUMENT: INSURERS LEAVE THE STATE WHEN ANY FORM OF COMMUNITY RATING IS ENACTED. Many insurers do indeed leave the state when community rating is enacted. That's not the false part. The false part is what the insurers leaving means. It means two things: companies that have the business model of identifying healthy people who currently have health insurance, but can "cherry pick them" to sell them new insurance, will realise that there pernicious and destabilized practice has come to an end in the state and leave. (Good riddance.) A few more reputable insurers may leave as well: it simply means the new market, with cherry picking eliminated, is now one in which there must now be competition to actually insure well and efficiently, and they just have to leave. (In economics this is called "creative destruction" and it is a good thing.)

Who am I? I am Norm Spier, a mathematical statistician who has spent most of his life in Metro NYC, Upstate New York, and Connecticut. Recently (3/2010), I moved from Vestal, in Upstate New York, to the Five Colleges area of Massachusetts.



This organization is trying to get health care for everyone in CT: HEALTHCARE4EVERY1 .

(They have a friendly web site, which makes it easy to email your state representatives and tell them you want health insurance for all in CT.


If you have any comments, please email me at norm@nastechservices.com





This site is supported donations and modest advertising revenue and . If you wish to donate via Paypal, you may use this link:




Legal Disclaimer: Note that at the time of posting of this information, to the best of my knowledge, the information above was correct. However, I can not be responsible for any errors above. (Especially, as I have left CT). Therefore, please check with the appropriate state insurance departments, and/or seek legal advice, as appropriate, before relying on the information above.

Also, note the above information is copyright 2000-2008 by Norman A. Spier.